Advantages And Disadvantages Of Trims Agreement

“The WTO is the only international agency responsible for monitoring international trade rules. It settles free trade agreements, resolves trade disputes between governments and organizes trade negotiations. [33] Trade-Related Investment Measures is one of the four main legal agreements of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Sorting is a rule that restricts the preference of domestic companies and thus allows international companies to operate more easily in foreign markets. The TRIPS agreement prohibits certain measures that violate national treatment and quantity requirements imposed by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). The “Make Trade Fair” campaign, launched by Oxfam International in October 2002, was on the agenda to eradicate global poverty. The campaign was marked by the concept that open market access, similar to that of the WTO through its various agreements such as trims, TRIPS and GATS, is a viable response to global poverty. Mr. Oxfam noted that while Jayne Forbes spoke of the GATS agreement, he cannot be distinguished from TRIMS, as both agreements are characterized by the same level of secrecy and negotiations on WTO dispute settlement and consultation regimes. Forbes adds that the GATS: Member States, through their membership of the WTO, impose on their citizens and governance a number of agreements to which they have not made a specific contribution.

This in itself is an affront to the fundamental concept of democratic institutions. Jayne Forbes, spokesperson for the Green Party of England and Wales for Globalisation, said such TRIMs should be eliminated by 31 December 1999. None of these measures are currently in effect. As a result, India has no outstanding obligations under the TRIMs agreement with respect to notified TRIMs. Bangladesh asserted that these allegations of violation of India constituted violations of various provisions of the 1994 GATT, including Article III. Bangladesh also claimed that these violations deprived it of its benefits and benefits under the GATT. On 20 February 2004, the European Community joined the consultation process and, until 20 February 2006, India was persuaded to withdraw its customs declaration, which resulted in the publication of its anti-dumping rules. [82] There is no way of knowing whether Bangladesh could have negotiated India`s withdrawal without the support of the European Community, but it is interesting to note that this was another case where the will of the developed nation prevailed over that of the developing countries.

Comments are closed.